The Multi-Sport Athlete

With the Canadian World Juniors not winning a medal in their 2nd consecutive World Championships, our nation believes that hockey needs to change how the grass roots level is operating. This was spear headed by head coach Brent Sutter's comments after their bronze medal game loss saying that kids are being forced to focus on results at a young age instead of developing their skills, and everything they do is to hockey oriented from such a young age. These comments got a lot of the youth soccer community talking as this is what they are trying to eliminate from the game in Canada. While getting in on this topic, I ended up getting into a lengthy discussion with a couple coaches about players who are multi-sport athletes, and thus don't "focus enough on their soccer development". The comment that really got me thinking was when one coach wrote:

"I have coached a boy’s team in the past with several high level hockey players and for them and their families the hockey always came first. Admittedly, these soccer players played the sport in the summer to keep fit and when they did not get the majority of playing time they were upset. As a coach I don’t want to build a team with such players being the corner stone. I have the greatest respect for those athletes who can compete at a high level in multiple sports, but that does not change the need for total commitment to the team. Both hockey and soccer are a 9 to 10 month a year sport and therefore there will be conflicts. As a coach I could not in good conscience give majority of the playing time to a player who does not practice regularly with the team between September to March. So I am not saying that my view is correct, but it is my view."

This got me really going because I don't agree with it at all, and believe that by penalizing individuals for being talented in more than one sport might actually drive them away from the game. In regards to this specific issue, in my eyes if the player is able to be one of your top players when they come back to join the team in the summer, and they are committed to the team, then they deserve to play more than a less skilled player on the team. This particular coach said it wasn't in the best interest of the team to build it around players who weren't around all year. If the coach is truly looking out for the best interest of the team, then they should be putting out their best players no matter what their commitment is in the winter. If the coach is looking for the best interest of the players (which should be the main focus), then this is taking away from those talented players who have talents in multiple sports.

Having coached a team with many multi-sport athletes, I never really cared to put much focus on the indoor portion of year by having a slightly leaner policy on attendance for training, and never entering into an indoor league.  I believe that allowing players to participate in other sports in the off season has many benefits because it  allows them to work on different skills that might not happen in soccer, allows them to analyse the game in different ways, and most importantly won't lead them to burning out from being too consumed with soccer at a young age that by the time they reach 15 or 16 they want to quit. What I noticed with my group when we first started playing games at the competitive level, the players who played other sports had a much better sense of positioning in comparison to other players who just played house league soccer the year before.

The argument then came up of if we want to be producing world class players in Canada, then they should focus on soccer to develop their skills. In regards to this, a true reality check needed to be given. At the end of the day, a very small percentage (1%) will end up going pro. To me, the players that do end up going far with the sport are the ones who truly want it (not their parents, not their coaches, not their coaches, or their peers). These are the players that will show up to every training session possible, go out on their own without being told, grab a ball work on their touches and watch games whenever they have the opportunity. To many times it is everybody else who wants to see a player excel in soccer, but the player themselves may not. If the player truly doesn't have the desire then even if they train 10 months a year with their club, they won't go anywhere.

My view on the multisport athlete is that parents shouldn't take it away from them if they can afford it, and the child is enjoying it. The athletes who have aspirations of getting to the next level will show that on their own by their actions away from the team. If they are a multisport athlete, when the time is right for them, they will make the decision as to which sport THEY want to focus on.

Should Ontario Youth Footy Follow the A, AA, AAA Model

2013 has been quite an interesting year for youth soccer in Ontario mainly due to the creation of the 2nd standards based league the OPDL (SAAC is the first despite what the OSA may try to claim). Although in theory a great idea, the OSA has handled this completely wrong as they have concentrated the majority of the clubs in 2 areas that makes it quite hard for clubs to get the truly elite level players throughout the province involved in the "top" league. There has been many blogs, tweets, and post on various forums about this so I won't go into details about it.

Yesterday I came across a newspaper article from the Toronto Star written about the GTHL looking at downsizing (eliminating non-competitive teams) and as I briefly discussed with another individual on twitter, something that needs to happen in the "competitive" world of of youth soccer in Ontario, as there are far to many teams playing at the rep level, and this has severely water downed the level of play. In the case of the GTHL, it is more of a shift in demographics as the majority of organizations that are struggling are from the east end of the GTA, and the same shift has been seen in youth soccer as well where once the Scraborough Soccer Association use to be a power house, but that has now shifted to Peel-Halton being the dominant area in Ontario youth soccer.

After reading this article, it rekindled some thoughts that I had that I believe could help change the landscape off soccer in Ontario, keep things more competitive on the filed, and not dilute the level of rep soccer as much as it is now. What I believe should be done is what happens in almost every other competitive team sport in Ontario where organizations are classified as A, AA, or AAA. Why I believe this would be better for the game is so that it eliminate a lot of teams/players who shouldn't be playing at the rep level, rids coaches of thinking about promotion and relegation (win at all cost), and it would PLACE THE PLAYERS AT THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL THEY SHOULD BE PLAYING. Instead of coaches being viewed as "successful" for winning trophies, they now could be looked at being successful for how many players they are able to develop to play at the next level.

For this to work, what would need to happen is that organizations would need to be classified as having teams in either as A, AA, or AAA (they me be affiliated with a club, or a stand alone organization). For some of the smaller areas, if they would like a AAA or AA organization it would be 1 team in that region so that they are able to pull from the surrounding towns without having to really worry about competition for players in neighbouring towns, and in larger areas such as Mississauga there may be 2 AAA clubs, 3 AA, and 3 A clubs. From there at the start of every season there would be tryouts where coaches would pick their top 15-18 players to make up their rosters with the rest of the players who aren't selected either trying out for another team, or play in their local house league program for the summer (which if numbers provide, will have an all-star team).

The leagues themselves will have standings, but there would be no promotion or relegation for teams, and if a player is doing very well in their current level, then hopefully the next season they will try-out for a team at a higher level. Like the OPDL, to coach at different levels coaches would be required to have a particular coaching level so that players playing at the AAA level are getting trained by individuals who have had higher training themselves. The AAA level could be where the provincial/national coaches go out to scout (maybe some AA games as well). As time goes by, we will be seeing the top players playing at the top level while receiving level appropriate training, and the same thing throughout the other 2 levels as well.

The reason why I believe that this would be the best way for soccer to progress is that it won't stretch thin top level training (often times right now, club's technical staff are working with very large groups, and in all reality a lot of the players need to be working on the basics first), teams don't need to focus on finishing at the top of their league to move up, but instead it will be based upon the individual player themselves and their skill level, and it will also eliminate the abundance of "rep" teams that currently exist. This model is used in hockey, baseball, basketball, and lacrosse to name a few sports, and the Canadian national teams are able to compete much better than the majority of national soccer teams.